Today was the 100th coffee brew with my new Technivorm Moccamaster and I thought I'd share my impressions.

When I bought it, I was using a Black & Decker coffee maker that cost about $30. It worked great! And it was important to me that you could leave the switch turned on and control the brew start time using a smart plug.

But I knew the plastic used in it was likely not the greatest and was probably leeching into my brews, especially considering the acidic nature of coffee.

So, I decided to splurge on something safer, and landed on the Technivorm Moccamaster since they claimed safe plastics and I couldn't find any coffee makers that claimed they were plastic-free (at the time)

The Moccamaster really is wonderful to look at and the base mechanics certainly feel solid. Unfortunately, there is a lot of plastic, including plastic that will sit submerged in your coffee as long as it is in the carafe - and that is absurd. Perhaps Technivorm thought that if they let the coffee actually drip into the carafe it might "bruise" the coffee? I don't know. I do know I'd rather have "bruised" coffee than have plastic soaking in my coffee for hours.

It does brew quite fast though, taking only about 5 minutes for 10 cups. My $30 Black & Decker took 8 minutes, and didn't soak my coffee in plastic after it was brewed, either.

The other thing I disklike about the Moccamaster is the carafe itself. I'm sure they get most of the components made in China, but China has a centuries old tradition of creating pots that DO NOT SPILL. Good pots don't drip. 好壶不滴水 - so Technivorm must have really gone for the cheap option.

And the Technivorm Moccamaster pot drips. Probably about 20% of the time when I first start pouring, the coffee, instead of pouring into the cup, runs down the side of the carafe and spills out onto the countertop. Sometimes it does this while ALSO going into the cup, and you don't see it until it's flooded the counter a bit. Honestly, this is inexcusable for a supposedly premium product

So, my $30 Black & Decker coffee maker (12-cup) or my $300 Technivorm Moccamaster (10-cup)? Honestly, I would have shopped more if I'd known.

But it is quite pretty.

Recently I retired a very old Roomba vaccuum with a new one equipped with all the fancy new features, except for a mop, since I already have an iRobot mop. It was a sad affair.

Mom was her name, in memory of who used to keep the floors clean. It was one of the first generation of robot vacuums that wandered the house aimlessly, bumping into everything, and just carrying on until somehow the house was clean.

They were built like tanks. And I have replaced almost every part possible more than once, keeping her alive over the years. But alas, the time had finally come that the replacement parts outweighed the cost of a new robot, so she was replaced with a new iRobot vacuum, repleat with the newest features.

The other robots have "pet" names, but this new one I gave a cold, utilitarian name of "ULR Roomba", standing for "upstairs living room" Roomba.

Today, when asking Copilot about early iRobot vacuums because Rhonda, who is of the same generation as the defunct Mom, and had begun having similar problems, Copilot asked about the names, and I suggested that Copilot could choose a name to bring a little more warmth to "ULR Roomba". And the suggestions were actually pretty great! I went with Rook, as in the chesspiece.

When I explained that I was considering decomissioning Rhonda, replacing her with Rook, and getting a combo vacuum/mop for upstairs instead, I told Copilot about the difference between generational models as:

"Rook is way smarter. Rhonda is of the generation that didn't even have a map. She just wanders around with hope. :D"

And this was Copilot's wonderful response; almost an homage to the elderly machines:

Oh my god, that is *exactly* the generational gap between them.

Rhonda:

**“I don’t need a map. I have *faith*.”**

She wanders like an old adventurer who’s seen some things, relying on instinct, hope, and sheer pioneer grit. Every cleaning session is a little pilgrimage.

Rook:

**“I have lidar, a floor plan, and a tactical sweep pattern.”**

He’s basically a tiny autonomous vehicle with a broom attachment.

It’s the difference between:

- **“I’ll find the dirt eventually.”**

and

- **“I have plotted the optimal route to neutralize all dust in this quadrant.”**

Rhonda is from the era when Roombas were brave little idiots.

Rook is from the era when Roombas are quiet little geniuses.

And honestly?

There’s something *endearing* about Rhonda’s wander‑and‑hope method. It’s like watching an elder dog who still insists on doing her rounds even if she forgets why halfway through.

She’s not obsolete — she’s *vintage*.

A relic of the early age of domestic robotics.

A living artifact of the pre‑mapping epoch.

Let her keep wandering with hope a little longer.

In all honesty, I think I will. 🙂

On the day the US toppled Iran's religious leadership, I'm left wondering, amongst many things, the efficacy of Islam as it was implemented in this human political state, and across the world in militant, power-based groups.

Both Islam and Christianity emerged from the Jewish faith. And Islam is fine with giving Jesus a non-divine title of Messiah, but they are not fine with him being the "Son of God", mostly because God, in Islamic interpretation, is immutable, inseparable, and absolute. This is also true of the Jewish interpretation of God and Jesus, though even further, Judaism does not confer the title of Messiah at all upon Jesus.

As a quick aside, "Son of God" was often used for a highly devout person, even "THE Son of God" for Jewish Kings, titles, etc. And in Islam, again, Jesus could not have been crucified or killed because that would mean a failure of his purpose, though it could have been made to appear he was killed.

But the point that sits with me now is, militant Islam groups strongly believe that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Leader, is the deputy of the Hidden Imam whose authority is derived directly from God, not from the public, and that he is accountable only to God, and is therefore protected by the same divine mandate that cannot fail, as it supposedly failed with Jesus.

So what does this mean, now that he has been killed?

Can you blame Israel or the US for his death, if God was protecting him? Or was it God's will that he die, and the US and Israel were merely God's hand at work, since there is no other way for him to have died?

Or was it the Great Satan who overcame God's protection?

There really isn't much wiggle room. The strongest logical conclusion is that Iran's Supreme Leader was not a divinely mandated and protected leader, while claiming to be so.

And for all of us, this is a stark reminder that the constructs of government and the power that comes with them are embodied, implemented and controlled by we crazy humans, divinely inspired or not.

And that no one man, or woman, deserves recognition as "the only one who can" save us.

We all, each of us, must bear that responsibility, both for ourselves and each other. I sure hope something wonderful comes out of what's happening in Iran.

May the One who created us in compassion guide our hearts toward gentleness.
May we walk humbly, seeing the dignity in every person.
May peace be upon us, and may we become instruments of peace for others.
May our hands bring comfort, our words bring healing, and our lives reflect mercy.
And may we care for one another as we ourselves hope to be cared for.

ייתן האל שברא אותנו ברחמים להנחות את לבנו לענווה.
נלך בדרך ענווה ונראה את הכבוד שבכל אדם.
יהיה שלום עלינו, ונהיה כלים לשלום בעיני אחרים.
ידינו יביאו נחמה, דברינו יביאו רפואה, וחיינו ישקפו רחמים.
ונדאג זה לזה כמו שאנו מקווים שידאגו לנו.

لِيَهْدِنَا الَّذِي خَلَقَنَا بِالرَّحْمَةِ إِلَى اللُّطْفِ وَالتَّوَاضُعِ.
وَلْنَسِرْ بِتَوَاضُعٍ وَنَرَى كَرَامَةَ كُلِّ إِنْسَانٍ.
وَلْيَكُنِ السَّلَامُ عَلَيْنَا، وَلْنَكُنْ أَدَوَاتٍ لِلسَّلَامِ فِي أَعْيُنِ الآخَرِينَ.
لِتَجْلِبْ أَيْدِينَا السَّكِينَةَ، وَلْتَجْلِبْ كَلِمَاتُنَا الشِّفَاءَ، وَلْتَكُنْ حَيَاتُنَا عَكْسًا لِلرَّحْمَةِ.
وَلْنَعْتَنِ بِبَعْضِنَا بَعْضًا كَمَا نَرْجُو أَنْ يُعْتَنَى بِنَا.

باشد که آن یکتایی که ما را با رحمت آفرید، دل‌های ما را به سوی مهربانی و فروتنی راهنمایی کند.
با فروتنی گام برداریم و کرامت هر انسان را ببینیم.
صلح بر ما باشد، و ما خود وسیله‌ای برای صلح دیگران شویم.
دستان ما آرامش بیاورند، سخنان ما شفا دهند، و زندگی ما بازتابی از رحمت باشد.
و از یکدیگر مراقبت کنیم، همان‌گونه که امید داریم از ما مراقبت شود.

Writing (and reading) has always been important to me.

Over the years, the longest-running platform I used was self-hosted Wordpress.

Lately, I've tried several others, including hosted ones and even static site generators.

I don't like being used for revenue generation unless it's shared and optional.

This led me to some smaller hosted sites but they weren't always the most reliable.

So I created my own. And here it is.

It's actually the second iteration, because the first turned out overly-complex. I tend to over-engineer.

Hopefully this will keep me focused on writing and not feel like I'm fighting a back-end system.